结论 - 小米 17-国足踢进世界杯-14年世界杯冠军_世界杯分组 - crzmzg.com

国足踢进世界杯 / 2026-08-04 21:18:10

结论 - 小米 17小米最新一代智能手机不仅开创了一个新的设备命名时代，而且使电池续航问题成为紧凑型智能手机的过去式。尽管手机外壳相对轻薄，但在我们的测试中，这款小巧的高端手机却能提供出色的电池续航能力，保证日常使用数天。

此外，高能效的骁龙 8 精英 5 代也为一流的电池性能做出了贡献。虽然高通芯片组的性能非常强大，但由于散热问题，尤其是图形芯片的散热问题，小米似乎无法充分发挥其潜力。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

除此之外，我们没有太多可以批评的地方。小米 17 提供了一个完全成功的完整套装。如果你迫不及待地想购买全球版本，又能忍受中国版本的限制（无Android Auto、无 eSIM 卡等），那么你就能买到目前外形最小巧的智能手机之一。此外，它的价格也很有吸引力，而且还有多种频率可供选择。

Pros+ 优质外壳

+ 虽然配备了 XXL 电池，但机身依然紧凑

+ 明亮的显示屏

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 优秀的主摄像头

+ 快速的 SoCCons- ...带节流

- 高浓度余热

- 目前仅限于中国

- 缺乏透明度

价格和供货情况 - 小米 17小米 17 最初只在中国推出，建议零售价为 4499 元人民币（约合 630 美元）起。在我们的租赁合作伙伴深圳贸易公司，进口价格约为 728 美元起。到目前为止，小米还没有发布任何有关国际发布的细节。不过，鉴于前代产品已经有了全球版本，我们认为未来在欧洲上市的可能性很大。

Table of Contents结论 - 小米 17规格 - 小米 17案例 - 边框纤薄的紧凑型智能手机功能 - 可输出图像的紧凑型旗舰手机软件 - 装有Android 16 的小米手机通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 带有 WiFi 的Android 手机 7电话功能和语音质量 - 紧凑型双 SIM 卡手机相机 - 小米 17 的新徕卡镜头配件和保修 - 小米 17 包括一个充电器输入设备和操作 - 配备超声波指纹传感器的小巧手机显示屏 - 小巧的智能手机却熠熠生辉性能 - 小米采用了最好的芯片组游戏 -Android ，一款具有游戏雄心的手机排放 - 小手机，大热量电池续航时间 -Android 拥有超强续航能力的手机Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags

由于中国制造商的最新旗舰智能手机系列赶上了目前的 iPhone 时代，小米现在与Apple 齐名。小米小米 15 的的后继机现在被命名为小米 17，并承诺以小巧的外形提供真正的旗舰体验。

与前代产品相比，这款产品的规格表有多项重大升级。最重要的是，这款紧凑型旗舰手机的电池容量提升到了一个全新的水平，而新的骁龙 8 精英 5 代应该会树立新的标杆。

规格 - 小米 17

Xiaomi 17 (17 Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 840Memory12 GB , LPDDR5XDisplay6.30 inch 19.5:9, 2656 x 1220 pixel 464 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO AMOLED , HDR, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB , 477 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast, Snapdragon soundNetworkingBluetooth 6.0, 5G：n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7/ n8 / n12 / n18 / n20 / n25 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89 ; 4G：FDD-LTE：B1 / B2 /B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25/ B26 / B28 / B66 TDD-LTE：B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 3G：WCDMA：B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G: GSM:B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 151.1 x 71.8Battery7000 mAh Silicon-CarbonChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 16CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.7, 23 mm, 1/1.31", 1.2 µm, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 60 mm, telephoto, 1/2.76", 0.64 µm, macro, OIS, 2.6x optical) + 50 MPix (f/2.4, 17 mm, ultrawide, 1/2.76")Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.2, 21 mm, PDAF)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, charger, case, USB cable, Hyper OS 3, 12 Months Warranty, Dolby Atmos | Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+ | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS, fanless, waterproofWeight191 g, Power Supply: 106 g

Price650 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

案例 - 边框纤薄的紧凑型智能手机小米 17 种颜色可供选择小米 17 的屏幕对角线尺寸为 6.3 英寸，是市场上最小巧的高端智能手机之一，厚度约为 8 毫米，重量仅为 191 克，比前代产品略薄，重量相同。前代.不过，它的电池容量大幅增加，现在达到了 7,000 毫安时，而相比之下，iPhone 17 Pro 的电池容量虽然小巧，但重量却要重得多。 iPhone 17 Pro的电池容量仅为 4,000 mAh 左右。

小米 17 的制造质量令人印象深刻。一体成型的铝合金边框和玻璃后壳触感极佳。磨砂表面有助于在视觉上隐藏指纹。此外，小米 17 还通过了 IP68 认证，具有出色的防尘防水性能。

屏幕四边边框非常纤薄，屏占比高达 89.5%。OLED 显示屏由龙晶玻璃保护，龙晶玻璃在国际上也被称为小米盾形玻璃。

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

ⓘ Marcus Herbrich

尺寸比较

Google Pixel 10 Pro Xiaomi 15 Xiaomi 17 Apple iPhone 17 Samsung Galaxy S25 DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 可输出图像的紧凑型旗舰手机小米 17 有多种配置，基本型号配备 12 GB LPDDR5X 内存和 256 GB 快速 UFS 4.1 存储空间。对存储空间有更高要求的用户只需选择顶级版本，它提供 1 TB 存储空间和 16 GB 内存。

这款小巧的高端手机配备了 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口，不仅能快速传输数据，还支持 USB OTG 和有线视频输出。内置的 Miracast 允许小米智能手机无线连接显示器。

内置的红外发射器和 NFC 可用于非接触式支付以及控制兼容设备。不过，小米 17 不支持 UWB，这在专业版.

箱体左侧

顶部箱体侧面

机箱右侧（按钮）

机身底部侧面（扬声器、USB 端口、红外爆破器、SIM 卡插槽）软件 - 装有Android 16 的小米手机小米 17 预装了Android 16 和 HyperOS 3，后者明显受到 iOS 界面的启发。例如，它包括 HyperIsland，这是小米对Apple 动态岛的诠释，提供了类似的功能。

此外，还提供了新的时钟设计，以及通过人工智能对人脸或动物照片进行分类和风格修改的功能，同样也是使用人工智能。运行 HyperOS 3 的小米智能手机现在即使关机也能在地图上定位。

与过去的中文版 HyperOS 一样，在欧洲你会发现只有英语才是真正可用的系统语言，而且你必须通过小米应用商店安装谷歌 Play 商店。不过，虽然谷歌框架已经包含在内，但小米只会公布全球版本的更新时间。

尽管如此，我们的中文版在未来四到五年内应该也会收到更新。值得肯定的是，Android 安全补丁是从 2025 年 10 月开始的，这也是本次评测的时间。

可持续性小米公司尚未披露其智能手机所使用的可回收材料比例的准确信息。这意味着，根据目前的信息，生态足迹也无法评估。如果有人认为这是一个重要因素，那么他或许应该考虑选择三星或 Apple设备。

小米 17 的包装似乎不使用塑料，而是用硬纸板制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 带有 WiFi 的Android 手机 7小米 17 支持现代 Wi-Fi 7 标准，有两个发射天线和两个接收天线（2x2 MIMO）。根据数据表，只能使用 2.4 GHz 和 5 GHz 频段建立连接。不过，在我们的测试中，也检测到了 6 GHz 频道，与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配合使用，我们实现了超过 1,000 Mbps 的高速传输。不过，与像素 10 Pro仍有改进的余地。

在移动连接方面，小米 17 为 5G 和 4G 网络提供了广泛的频率范围，包括对良好网络覆盖（有时在农村地区）非常重要的 LTE 频段。它支持 Band 20 和 Band 28，以及 MIMO（4x4）。

NetworkingXiaomi 17 iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1086 (min: 1009) MBit/s ∼69%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1262 (min: 1051) MBit/s ∼70%

Samsung Galaxy S25Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1058 (min: 518) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1167 (min: 1006) MBit/s ∼73%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1210 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼77%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1201 (min: 1184) MBit/s ∼67%

Google Pixel 10 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000

928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼58%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1571 MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼97%

Xiaomi 15Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼55%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%

Apple iPhone 17802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000

777 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼73%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1592 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1020 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼65%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1658 (min: 1579) MBit/s ∼92%

Global Average -3 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

991 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼94%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1076 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1369 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1473 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼82%

Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000

685 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼65%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

721 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼45%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1279 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼81%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1396 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼78%

Xiaomi 17 ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1086 (1009-1197) MBit/sSamsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1210 (998-1383) MBit/sXiaomi 17 ; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1262 (1051-1324) MBit/sSamsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1200 (1184-1221) MBit/sSamsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1042 (518-1295) MBit/sSamsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1165 (1006-1197) MBit/s

室内追踪

户外跟踪这款小巧的高端手机在双频模式下使用所有常见的主要卫星系统进行定位跟踪。

在实际测试中，定位非常成功，我们在旅途中没有观察到任何明显的偏差。

小米 17 准确地再现了路线，我们的 Garmin Venu 2 对比设备也提供了非常相似的路线。

Garmin Venu 2

小米 17

电话功能和语音质量 - 紧凑型双 SIM 卡手机

小米 17 通过两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽提供完整的双 SIM 卡功能。中国版本不允许在系统中集成 eSIM 卡，但全球版本中将提供这一功能。

通话质量始终良好，语音传输清晰。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。

相机 - 小米 17 的新徕卡镜头与小米 17 自拍该相机系统再次与徕卡合作开发。小米现在在其紧凑型高端智能手机中使用了四个 5000 万像素传感器，这意味着自拍相机也得到了升级。新的前置镜头基于 Omnivision OV50M，它也负责超广角镜头。

曝光和色彩还原都非常出色，得益于自动对焦功能，自拍效果也非常清晰。前置摄像头可以录制 4K60 视频，而新的主摄像头甚至可以录制 8K 视频。

0.6x1x2x2.6x5x10x60 倍（最大值）前面提到的主摄像头采用了名为 Light Hunter 950 的新型 1/1.3 英寸传感器。该传感器旨在提供特别高的动态范围，并由 OIS 系统提供支持。在日光环境下，小米 17 能拍摄出非常出色的照片，即使拍摄对象略微锐化，这款小巧的小米手机在弱光环境下的表现也令人惊讶。相比之下 iPhone 17拍摄的照片明显不够细腻和模糊。

在变焦拍摄方面，还配备了一个具有光学防抖功能和无损 2.6 倍放大率的长焦镜头。由于采用了液态镜头设计，您还可以进行微距拍摄。

在日常情况下，只要光线条件合适，三星 JN5（对于一款紧凑型手机而言）就能提供良好的拍摄效果。即使是 10 倍变焦拍摄的效果也不会比专业机型.

17 毫米超广角镜头的视场角为 102 度，成像效果不错，但并不特别出色。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide-angleclick to load imagesXiaomi 17Apple iPhone 17Oppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi 17Apple iPhone 17Oppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi 17Apple iPhone 17Oppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi 17Apple iPhone 17Oppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

在可控光照条件下，我们对图像质量进行了更详细的检查，并将小米 17 与参考色进行了比较，我们记录到的偏差在令人满意的范围内。不过，在这个价位的智能手机中，也有一些手机的色彩增亮效果没有那么夸张，而且在过度饱和度方面也比较容易控制。

16.4 ∆E8 ∆E15.7 ∆E17.1 ∆E11.3 ∆E6 ∆E7.9 ∆E15.4 ∆E10.7 ∆E7.4 ∆E9.2 ∆E4.9 ∆E11.5 ∆E15.8 ∆E13.6 ∆E0.8 ∆E10.6 ∆E14.6 ∆E7.4 ∆E4.9 ∆E10.3 ∆E14.9 ∆E7.6 ∆E3.6 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi 17: 10.23 ∆E min: 0.75 - max: 17.06 ∆E17.8 ∆E18.7 ∆E17.1 ∆E17.9 ∆E19.9 ∆E16.4 ∆E26.4 ∆E14.3 ∆E15.7 ∆E15 ∆E18.4 ∆E26.8 ∆E13.3 ∆E20.1 ∆E11.9 ∆E15.7 ∆E18.4 ∆E19.7 ∆E17 ∆E14.8 ∆E15.1 ∆E21.5 ∆E16.9 ∆E11.6 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi 17: 17.52 ∆E min: 11.65 - max: 26.75 ∆E

Xiaomi 17Xiaomi 17

配件和保修 - 小米 17 包括一个充电器中国版的包装盒内有一条 USB-C 数据线、一个保护套、一个 SIM 卡弹出工具和一个电源适配器。虽然全球版本可能没有充电器，但该机型确实预装了屏幕保护膜。

小米智能手机的保修保修期为 12 个月，如果从深圳贸易公司进口的设备需要保修，您可以将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 配备超声波指纹传感器的小巧手机在 AMOLED 显示屏上进行的输入都能准确、灵敏地记录下来。由于小米指定的采样率高达 300 Hz，这款紧凑型旗舰手机的用户体验非常流畅，凭借其出色的振动电机，在日常使用中可提供清晰的触觉反馈。

在身份验证方面，小米智能手机采用了 3D 超声波技术。内置在显示屏中的超声波传感器能可靠地识别指纹，并快速解锁智能手机。此外，还可通过不安全的 2D 面部解锁功能进行生物面部识别。然而，这种方法被认为是脆弱的，因此安全性较低。

显示屏 - 小巧的智能手机却熠熠生辉子像素排列6.3 英寸屏幕支持高达 120 Hz 的刷新率，由于采用了 LTPO 技术，它可以将上述刷新率降低到低至 1 Hz 的节能水平。像素密度超过 460 PPI，图像非常清晰。

据说，OLED 面板的峰值亮度为 3,500 尼特，比上一代产品亮 11%。亮度提高了 11但同时功耗更低。我们使用逼真的 APL18 测试模式测得的最大亮度为 3,339 cd/m²，这与实际亮度非常接近，尤其是 HDR 内容通常可以让 OLED 面板获得额外的亮度。

在亮度控制方面，小米采用了 PWM 技术--这是 OLED 显示屏的典型技术。根据规格说明，它具有 2,160 Hz 的高频率，我们测得的基线闪烁频率约为 120 Hz。在我们的示波器测量中，整个亮度范围内的振幅响应都是一致的。一个新功能是可以在直流和 PWM 调光之间切换。

1015cd/m²1025cd/m²1024cd/m²1026cd/m²1030cd/m²1010cd/m²1012cd/m²1022cd/m²1029cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1030 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1021.4 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 1030 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.44 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}102.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.274CCT: 6868 K

Xiaomi 17LTPO AMOLED , 2656x1220, 6.3"Samsung Galaxy S25AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"Google Pixel 10 ProOLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"Xiaomi 15OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"Apple iPhone 17OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"Screen-12%65%7%15%Brightness middle (cd/m²)10301301 26%2161 110%1021 -1%1138 10%Brightness (cd/m²)10211311 28%2198 115%1018 0%1127 10%Brightness Distribution (%)9898 0%94 -4%98 0%96 -2%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.443.1 -115%0.7 51%1.3 10%1.07 26%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.684.4 -20%1.8 51%2.9 21%2.99 19%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.52.3 8%0.8 68%2.2 12%1.8 28%Gamma2.274 97%2.01 109%2.19 100%2.25 98%2.22 99%CCT6868 95%6454 101%6646 98%6658 98%6516 100%* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 HzAmplitude: 18 %The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度

25% 亮度

50% 亮度

75% 亮度

100% 亮度以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行了测量，结果清楚地表明，该屏幕不仅非常亮丽，而且在 "原色专业 "模式下还能提供高度精确的色彩还原。肉眼无法察觉 sRGB 色彩空间内色调和灰度的偏差。

提供两种不同的色彩配置文件和色温调节，而伽玛值等个别参数则无法再在 HyperOS 3 中进行定制。

色彩准确度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：P3）

色彩空间（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

灰度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

色彩饱和度（配置文件：Original Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3 ms rise↘ 0.3 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.2 ms rise↘ 0.2 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms).

小米 17 的高亮度也使其 OLED 面板适合户外使用，不过玻璃表面的反光还是会让人烦恼。即使在广视角下，显示内容的色彩也非常稳定，我们在日常使用中没有观察到任何明显的色彩或亮度值变化。

性能 - 小米采用了最好的芯片组小米 17 采用骁龙 8 精英 5 代使其成为市场上性能最强的智能手机之一。

这款 3nm 芯片在小巧的小米手机中提供了强大的单核性能。凭借 Oryon Gen 3 Prime 内核，小米手机可与 Apple A19在 i手机 17.

在 Geekbench 6 多核测试中，骁龙 8 旗舰 5 代明显优于Apple 。

Single-CoreApple iPhone 17Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192

3732 Points +2%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

3662 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3462 - 3831, n=22)

3631 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

3087 Points -16%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

3001 Points -18%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

2308 Points -37%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=183, last 2 years)

1877 Points -49% Multi-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9631 - 12383, n=22)

10940 Points +1%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

10842 Points Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

9776 Points -10%Apple iPhone 17Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192

9456 Points -13%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

9202 Points -15%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

6314 Points -42%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=183, last 2 years)

5584 Points -48%Antutu v10 - Total Score

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2390211 - 4185521, n=7)

2880126 Points +13%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

2677100 Points +5%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

2545132 Points Apple iPhone 17Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192

2158729 Points -15%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

1975467 Points -22%Average of class Smartphone (264891 - 3269237, n=89, last 2 years)

1536755 Points -40%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

1338955 Points -47%PCMark for Android - Work 3.x

Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

20623 Points +6%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9790 - 28557, n=13)

19502 Points 0%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

19432 Points Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

19192 Points -1%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

15738 Points -19%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=135, last 2 years)

15220 Points -22%BaseMark OS II

OverallXiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

13984 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5640 - 16690, n=16)

12946 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

11876 Points -15%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

11031 Points -21%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

8446 Points -40%Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=111, last 2 years)

8085 Points -42% SystemXiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

19207 Points Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

17132 Points -11%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9356 - 21153, n=16)

16952 Points -12%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

16439 Points -14%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

12881 Points -33%Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=111, last 2 years)

11658 Points -39% MemoryXiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

16964 Points Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

16961 Points 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5531 - 24052, n=16)

15666 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

14759 Points -13%Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=111, last 2 years)

9437 Points -44%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

7257 Points -57% GraphicsXiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

52356 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9859 - 62351, n=16)

50979 Points -3%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

44189 Points -16%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

33965 Points -35%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

30035 Points -43%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=111, last 2 years)

25406 Points -51% WebSamsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

2275 Points +2%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

2234 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1561 - 2587, n=16)

2185 Points -2%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

1813 Points -19%Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=111, last 2 years)

1762 Points -21%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

1202 Points -46%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI

Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

23076 Points Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

21837 Points -5%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24487, n=12)

21132 Points -8%Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 78695, n=96, last 2 years)

19929 Points -14%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

18154 Points -21%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

17652 Points -24%AImark - Score v3.x

Apple iPhone 17Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192

35717 Points +1896%Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=73, last 2 years)

17721 Points +891%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

1893 Points +6%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

1790 Points 0%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

1789 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (774 - 2381, n=7)

1683 Points -6%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

1477 Points -17%Geekbench AI

Single Precision NPU 1.7Apple iPhone 17Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192

4677 Points +570%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

698 Points Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=117, last 2 years)

662 Points -5%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=21)

640 Points -8%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

478 Points -32% Half Precision NPU 1.7Apple iPhone 17Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192

35502 Points +5396%Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=117, last 2 years)

2588 Points +301%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

907 Points +40%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

646 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=21)

628 Points -3% Quantized NPU 1.7Apple iPhone 17Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192

48896 Points +3370%Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=117, last 2 years)

3879 Points +175%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

3792 Points +169%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1987, n=21)

1455 Points +3%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

1409 Points AI Benchmark

Score V5Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

590 Points Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=23, last 2 years)

483 Points Score V6Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1098 - 22780, n=11)

18217 Points +1559%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288

12223 Points +1013%Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=77, last 2 years)

5829 Points +431%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288

1098 Points Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288

991 Points -10%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384

797 Points -27%

在图形处理性能方面，小米 17 给我们留下了深刻的印象，它配备了高通 Adreno 840也表现出色。在数据表中，GPU 性能比上一代机型提高了前代机型在要求苛刻的 4K 高阶 GFXBench 基准测试中并不明显，但 48fps 仍然非常不错。不过 Galaxy S25性能提高了 6%。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

6932 Points +10%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

6321 Points Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

5845 Points -8%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

4904 Points -22%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3232 Points -49%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

6854 Points +9%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

6311 Points Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

5995 Points -5%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

5022 Points -20%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

3281 Points -48%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

27327 Points +7%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

25598 Points Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

24960 Points -2%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

21785 Points -15%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

13193 Points -48%3DMark / Solar Bay Score

Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

12146 Points Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11765 Points -3%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

10764 Points -11%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

10197 Points -16%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score

Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

12139 Points Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11687 Points -4%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

11649 Points -4%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

10389 Points -14%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score

Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

2532 Points Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2258 Points -11%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

2124 Points -16%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1013 Points -60%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score

Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

2566 Points Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

2362 Points -8%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

2197 Points -14%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1014 Points -60%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Points -100%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen

Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

121 fps +1%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

120 fps Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

60 fps -50%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen

Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

761 fps Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

718 fps -6%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

711 fps -7%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

534.3 fps -30%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

406 fps -47%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL

Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

121 fps +1%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

120 fps Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

60 fps -50%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

502 fps +30%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

423 fps +10%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

385 fps Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

338.5 fps -12%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

282 fps -27%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen

Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

120 fps Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

119 fps -1%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

60 fps -50%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen

Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

332 fps Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

308 fps -7%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

268 fps -19%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

230 fps -31%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

207 fps -38%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen

Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

120 fps Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

60 fps -50%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

59 fps -51%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

211 fps +9%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

193 fps Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

192 fps -1%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

164.8 fps -15%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

81 fps -58%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

120 fps Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

115 fps -4%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

64 fps -47%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

60 fps -50%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

118 fps +9%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

108 fps Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

100 fps -7%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

69.8 fps -35%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

55 fps -49%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen

Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps 0%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

120 fps Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

94 fps -22%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

60 fps -50%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

281 fps Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

279 fps -1%Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

274 fps -2%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

202.5 fps -28%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

127 fps -55%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

52 fps +6%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

49 fps Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

47 fps -4%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

29.6 fps -40%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

25 fps -49%

尽管在浏览器基准测试中成绩不佳，但这款小巧的手机仍是浏览互联网的上佳之选。即使在浏览要求较高的网站时，加载时间也非常短，滚动也非常流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total

Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)

467.799 Points +23290%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)

339.45 Points +16873%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=15)

280 Points +13900%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)

274.298 Points +13615%Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=88, last 2 years)

217 Points +10750%Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)

2 Points Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0

Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)

39.6 runs/min +89%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)

29.9 runs/min +43%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)

23.5 runs/min +12%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (14.4 - 31.4, n=7)

21.5 runs/min +3%Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)

20.9 runs/min Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)

20.6 runs/min -1%Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=86, last 2 years)

16.2 runs/min -22%WebXPRT 4 - Overall

Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)

290 Points +184%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)

244 Points +139%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)

177 Points +74%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=10)

169.7 Points +66%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)

168 Points +65%Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=94, last 2 years)

145.3 Points +42%Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)

102 Points Octane V2 - Total Score

Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)

110696 Points +117%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)

95809 Points +88%Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)

84055 Points +65%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (47984 - 126661, n=15)

81776 Points +60%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)

78653 Points +54%Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=140, last 2 years)

52700 Points +3%Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)

50987 Points Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total

Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=119, last 2 years)

1058 ms * -67%Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)

634.81 ms * Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)

472.5 ms * +26%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=19)

467 ms * +26%Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)

454.4 ms * +28%Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)

389.3 ms * +39%Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)

263.1 ms * +59%* ... smaller is better

凭借速度极快的 UFS 4.1 存储，小米 17 在 AndroBench 读写测试中表现出色。

Xiaomi 17Samsung Galaxy S25Google Pixel 10 ProXiaomi 15Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-43%-55%-20%-16%-44% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)3943.443982.43 1%1492.74 -62%3934.92 0%3633 ?(1954 - 4366, n=43) -8%2227 ?(270 - 4370, n=171, last 2 years) -44% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)3784.972256.71 -40%1353.55 -64%3889.06 3%3189 ?(339 - 4113, n=43) -16%1910 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=171, last 2 years) -50% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)487.69299.89 -39%264.44 -46%296.95 -39%413 ?(279 - 614, n=43) -15%311 ?(47.6 - 614, n=171, last 2 years) -36% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)643.3151.76 -92%347.84 -46%360.36 -44%480 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=43) -25%358 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=171, last 2 years) -44%

游戏 -Android ，一款具有游戏雄心的手机我们测试的Android 游戏都能流畅运行。骁龙 8 第五代精英版没有任何异常。不过，考虑到其强大的性能，我们并不期望帧速率会出现任何下降。我们使用GameBench应用程序来查看小米 17 能达到多少帧/秒。

我们的记录显示，只有《死亡扳机 2》可以享受 HFR 游戏。看来《PUBG Mobile》仍有优化的余地，因为我们甚至没有在低细节下达到 120fps 的最高帧数。

Xiaomi 17; Dead Trigger 2: Ø107.4 (95-121) fpsXiaomi 17; Genshin Impact: Ø59.8 (53-61) fpsXiaomi 17; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (47-61) fpsXiaomi 17; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (55-61) fpsXiaomi 17; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (37-42) fps

排放 - 小手机，大热量温度我们记录的表面温度测量值非常高。在一个热点区域，小米 17 的温度甚至超过了 50 摄氏度，虽然这可能在可承受的散热范围内，但它确实对性能产生了负面影响。

通过 3DMark 压力测试，我们仔细观察了节流行为。在重复 20 次后，计算出的每秒帧数在基准测试过程中明显下降，我们观察到大约 30% 的节流。不过，在日常情况下，我们没有发现任何应用程序或游戏限制。

Max. LoadIdle

47.7 °C46.6 °C44.2 °C 48.3 °C47.2 °C41.2 °C 48.7 °C46.9 °C41.5 °C

Maximum: 48.7 °CAverage: 45.8 °C

37.4 °C41.2 °C43.3 °C38.2 °C43 °C45 °C38.5 °C42.6 °C50.1 °C

Maximum: 50.1 °CAverage: 42.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 42.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

24.2 °C24.5 °C24.7 °C 24.8 °C24.6 °C24.5 °C 24.8 °C24.6 °C24.5 °C

Maximum: 24.8 °CAverage: 24.6 °C

24.2 °C24.4 °C24.5 °C24.8 °C24.6 °C24.7 °C24.8 °C24.9 °C25 °C

Maximum: 25 °CAverage: 24.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 37.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark

Wild Life Stress Test StabilityApple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

96.8 % +33%Google Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

81.2 % +12%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

72.8 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66.3 % -9%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

52.7 % -28% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestGoogle Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

88.7 % +20%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

73.8 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

68.7 % -7%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

65.4 % -11%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

47.5 % -36% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

73 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

66.9 % -8%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

66.1 % -9%Samsung Galaxy S25Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

54.1 % -26% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 10 ProDXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

97.3 % +30%Xiaomi 17Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash

74.7 % Xiaomi 15Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

69.5 % -7%Apple iPhone 17A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe

65.4 % -12%

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø30.7 (28-38) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2) %Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.2 (98.9-135.9) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4) %Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø31.9 (26.8-36.8) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.8 (24.8-37.1) %Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16 (13.9-18.6) %Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6) %

发言人小米 17 配备了杜比 Atmos 立体声扬声器，对于一款小巧的手机来说，它能提供出人意料的良好音效体验。声音具有深度，粉红噪声测试显示中高音的频率响应相当线性。

喜欢通过耳机欣赏音乐的用户可以通过有线 USB 连接或带有 Auracast 功能的无线蓝牙 6.0 享受音乐。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Xiaomi 17 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 17 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Android 拥有超强续航能力的手机耗电量小米智能手机的亮点之一是其电池容量非常大。电池容量为 7,000 mAh，比上一代产品增大了 20%。据小米称，这是通过使用硅含量高达 16% 的电池和 894 Wh/L 的高能量密度实现的。

制造商称，经过 2,000 次充电后，电池容量仍可保持 80%，低于此值一般被视为电池状态不佳。使用兼容的 HyperCharge 电源适配器，小米 17 可以通过 PPS 协议以高达 100 瓦的功率快速充电。我们的测试耗时约 40 分钟。不过，如果你赶时间，就需要激活 "加速 "模式。

无线充电的功率为 50 瓦，有线反向快速充电（用于入耳式耳机）的功率也高达 22.5 瓦。

高通高通 SoC 的高通 SoC 在空闲时的功耗比其前代产品小米 17 稍高。不过，不到 2 瓦的功耗仍在绿色范围内。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.1 / 0.2 WattIdle 0.7 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt

Load

5.9 / 11.7 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Xiaomi 177000 mAhSamsung Galaxy S254000 mAhGoogle Pixel 10 Pro4870 mAhXiaomi 155400 mAhApple iPhone 173692 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-14%-35%11%-14%-7%-8%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.70.47 33%1.01 -44%0.5 29%1.1 -57%0.869 ?(0.52 - 1.4, n=16) -24%0.879 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=134, last 2 years) -26%Idle Average * (Watt)1.41.04 26%1.65 -18%1.11 21%1.3 7%1.321 ?(0.74 - 2.13, n=16) 6%1.474 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=134, last 2 years) -5%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.71.07 37%2.05 -21%1.13 34%1.5 12%1.526 ?(0.75 - 2.2, n=16) 10%1.663 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=134, last 2 years) 2%Load Average * (Watt)5.913.33 -126%7.25 -23%8.91 -51%7.6 -29%7.71 ?(4.2 - 11.4, n=13) -31%6.75 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=94, last 2 years) -14%Load Maximum * (Watt)11.716.38 -40%19.78 -69%9.3 21%12 -3%11.1 ?(6.97 - 15.3, n=13) 5%11.2 ?(4.75 - 22, n=94, last 2 years) 4%* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.46 (3.53-12.8) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (0.661-16.4) WattXiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.778-1.37) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956) Watt

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.1-11.7) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (9.13-16.2) WattXiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.778-1.37) WattSamsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956) Watt

电池寿命加上超大容量电池，小米 17 在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中实现了约 31 小时的超长续航时间。将显示屏亮度调至 150 cd/m²，这款小巧的旗舰手机在禁用 Wi-Fi 的情况下连续播放视频的时间超过了 36 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

72h 39min

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)

30h 55min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

36h 06min

Load (maximum brightness)

4h 15min

Xiaomi 177000 mAhSamsung Galaxy S254000 mAhGoogle Pixel 10 Pro4870 mAhXiaomi 155400 mAhApple iPhone 173692 mAhBattery runtime-34%-36%-8%-15%Reader / Idle (h)72.745.2 -38%33.1 -54%62.7 -14%66.7 -8%H.264 (h)36.126.5 -27%24 -34%29.7 -18%29.4 -19%WiFi v1.3 (h)30.918 -42%21.1 -32%22.8 -26%20.1 -35%Load (h)4.33 -30%3.3 -23%5.4 26%4.4 2%

Notebookcheck 总体评分小米 17 令人印象深刻地展示了未来紧凑型智能手机的模样。

至少在最新一代的小米手机上，重度用户只需充电一次就能使用一天的时代已经成为过去。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi 17

- 10/27/2025 v8

Marcus Herbrich

Chassis91%

Keyboard66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device96%

Connectivity59 / 69 → 85%

Weight89%

Battery96%

Display92%

Games Performance48 / 55 → 88%

Application Performance76 / 85 → 90%

AI Performance43%

Temperature83%

Noise100%

Audio86 / 90 → 95%

Camera85%

Average70%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials25%Packaging75%Power Use96%Repairability30%Software Updates75% Total Sustainability Score: 50.2%

可能的替代品比较

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay

1.89.2%Xiaomi 17Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: 1. $830.00XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compat...2. $985.34XIAOMI 17 5G Ai (Compatible ...3. $1,246.23XIAOMI 17 Ultra Ai 5G (Compa...List Price: 650€191 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.30"2656x1220464 PPILTPO AMOLED

2.88.9%Samsung Galaxy S25Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 899€162 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"2340x1080416 PPIAMOLED

3.88.9%Google Pixel 10 ProGoogle Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 1199€207 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.30"2856x1280497 PPIOLED

4.88.4%Xiaomi 15Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: List Price: 760€191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2670x1200460 PPIOLED

5.87.9%Apple iPhone 17Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 GPU ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMeAmazon: List Price: 949 Euro177 g256 GB NVMe6.30"2622x1206460 PPIOLED

小米 17 Ultra 相机评测：LOFIC 传感器和机械变焦详解

03/09/2026

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 180 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 813826 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

电视剧《亲爱的，公主病》：看张予曦演绎锦衣玉食的爱情
愤怒🤬🤬Karsa微博辟谣：我跟假赛狗不共戴天，某论坛别捏造事实带我节奏